Written by Keshala Dias
22 May, 2017 | 3:10 pm
How Facebook censors what its users see has been revealed by internal documents, the Guardian newspaper says.
It said the manuals revealed the criteria used to judge if posts were too violent, sexual, racist, hateful or supported terrorism.
The Guardian said Facebook’s moderators were “overwhelmed” and had only seconds to decide if posts should stay.
The leak comes soon after MPs said social media giants were “failing” to tackle toxic content.
The newspaper said it had managed to get hold of more than 100 manuals used internally at Facebook to educate moderators about what could, and could not, be posted on the site.
Facebook has not commented on the authenticity of the documents seen by the newspaper.
The manuals cover a vast array of sensitive subjects, including hate speech, revenge porn, self-harm, suicide, cannibalism and threats of violence.
Facebook moderators interviewed by the newspaper said the policies Facebook used to judge content were “inconsistent” and “peculiar”.
The decision-making process for judging whether content about sexual topics should stay or go were among the most “confusing”, they said.
The Guardian says its glimpse into the internal decision-making process at Facebook was likely to renew calls for the site to be more carefully policed and for more transparency on how it judges what people post.
In a statement, Monica Bickert, Facebook’s head of global policy management, said: “We work hard to make Facebook as safe as possible, while enabling free speech.
“This requires a lot of thought into detailed and often difficult questions, and getting it right is something we take very seriously,” she added.
As well as human moderators that look over possibly contentious posts, Facebook is also known to use AI-derived algorithms to review images and other information before they are posted. It also encourages users to report pages, profiles and content they feel is abusive.
In early May, the influential Home Affairs Select Committee strongly criticised Facebook and other social media companies as being “shamefully far” from tackling the spread of hate speech and other illegal and dangerous content.
The government should consider making sites pay to help police content, it said.
Soon after, Facebook revealed it had set out to hire more than 3,000 more people to review content.
The NSPCC said the report into how Facebook worked was “alarming to say the least”.
“It needs to do more than hire an extra 3,000 moderators,” said a statement from the charity.
“Facebook, and other social media companies, need to be independently regulated and fined when they fail to keep children safe.”
26 Mar, 2021 | 09:10 AM
21 Dec, 2020 | 10:45 AM
Are you interested in advertising on our website or video channel
Please contact us at [email protected]